About Dental Tartar from an NMG Perspective and Evidence That It Is Not Caused by Sweets or Smoking

 

Every medical article I’ve read online attributes the formation of tartar to the following: low saliva production, diet, and smoking. Among the foods listed are carbohydrates (i.e., anything containing flour, bread, cookies, and various sweets) and sugars (candy, cakes, including fruit, and carbonated drinks).

Fine. And who am I to challenge that? It’s not me challenging it, but the renowned Dr. Geerd Ryke Hamer, a physician with years of experience and study, who has been widely contested and vilified. I’m simply offering personal evidence that supports Dr. Hamer.

If tartar were caused by saliva, food, or smoking, wouldn’t it be normal for it to build up evenly on the molars, for example? Don’t we have the same saliva throughout our mouths, or don’t we chew food with all our teeth in the same place? I’m just asking…

My upper left molars—flawless, without a trace of tartar:

And the ones on the right, also at the top, but covered in a horrible amount of tartar:

I wonder why?

Do I eat more on one side and less on the other? No, not at all—and even if I did, the food moves around in my mouth long enough for the “dangerous” substances to be spread everywhere.

So why, then?

Obviously, the enamel on teeth with tartar is different from that on the others. I wonder why?

German medicine clearly provides us with a very clear explanation.

It’s the age-old conflict associated with the teeth and the entire digestive system in general: anger, nerves, the urge to bite, to take revenge on someone who has hurt you. Just as dogs bite each other when they’re angry, humans biologically have the same tendency—it’s just that social rules and ethical norms don’t allow it. So what happens? Well, various imbalances arise throughout the digestive system, in the areas where we’re most sensitive. Some develop cavities galore and have ruined teeth because they wanted to bite their adversary but couldn’t; others get heartburn; some have swollen tonsils; others experience nausea and diarrhea while trying to expel various toxic “bites” (situations, not food); others become constipated while trying to mark their territory, and so on.

Well, what about my tartar?

This is where the concept of laterality, as defined by Dr. Hamer, comes into play. Right-handed people experience conflicts related to their mother or children on the left side and conflicts related to their partners on the right side. For left-handed people, it’s the other way around. Why do right-handed people experience these conflicts on the left? Because a right-handed mother holds her child on her left side when feeding him or her. The left side represents the mother or children (including pets and everyone we consider to be a mother or child to us), and the right side represents partners (that is, the father, husband, neighbors, colleagues, etc.—everyone who is not our mother or child). And a husband can be on the left if we view him as a child rather than as a true life partner.

The lateralization of most organs helps us identify who caused the conflict. For example, if a right-handed mother has back pain on the right side, it’s possible that the conflict was caused by her partner. If her teeth on the left side are decaying, she may have felt anger toward her own mother, who at some point forced her to do something she didn’t want to do. I think that’s clear...

I’m right-handed, so my teeth on the right are linked to someone in the “partner” category. Since I’ve had tartar on them for as long as I can remember, the culprit isn’t my husband but my father, who was very harsh with me when I was little. I won’t go into details. Harshness and psychological pressure beyond what’s normal. We weren’t getting a stick on the butt—we were getting a military boot on the back. One of those…

Okay, okay, and now let’s get back to tartar. How does it form?

Dr. Hamer says this: when tartar forms on the teeth, it means we’ve experienced a “I’m not allowed to bite” conflict; when it’s the dentin, it means “I’m physically unable to, because my opponent is stronger.” Since I have both tartar and cavities in that area, it means I’ve “experienced” both conflicts simultaneously.

Tartar forms on affected enamel. Healthy enamel is so strong and shiny that a mere piece of candy or an apple doesn’t stand a chance. Only when tartar loses its shine—that is, when it degrades as a result of an internal conflict—does it allow minerals from saliva to deposit.

Interesting, isn’t it?

So how do we solve the problem? Scaling isn’t the best solution. Tartar often keeps the teeth connected, and after scaling—I’m telling you this from the experience of those close to me—we end up losing teeth that are no longer secure because the gums haven’t had time to recover. Scaling is a brutal solution. The problem is solved by resolving the conflicts we have with the people we wanted to bite but couldn’t. Pretending to bite someone by biting into a carrot or an apple might be a solution, but it’s a bit complicated after 30 years of conflict. And as for me and my dad… I feel sorry for him now that he’s so old that I can’t bring myself to bite him anymore. Sometimes pieces of tartar fall off my lower front incisors on their own, but they just build up again. Probably when we manage to completely resolve our conflicts, we’ll have flawless teeth too.

What do you think?

Take care,

Geo 

--------------------------

Here's an English course for beginners, if you're interested:

https://www.udemy.com/course/new-german-medicine/?referralCode=C36CC2DEF701A1364318